Quantcast
Channel: Exchange Server 2013 - Mail Flow and Secure Messaging forum
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3660

X.400 addresses and IMCEAEX NDRs

$
0
0

I admit this has been in my "If you don't look at it funny, it will not mess with you" category.  However after having some interesting conversations at Ignite last week I decided to go back and look at this.  

Occasionally I have a user that reports the "IMCEAEX" NDR.  I have always had them delete their address autofill cache and the issue was resolved.  Our mailboxes have X.400 addresses assigned.  They have been there since I took over the environment.  There are no X.500 addresses.

I ran the following to see if there are issues I was not aware of:

Get-TransportServer | Get-MessageTrackinglog -EventID FAIL -Start (Get-Date).AddDays(-7) -ResultSize Unlimited | Where {$_.Recipients -match "^IMCEAEX*"}

This returned a large number of results.

My question is, do I need x.400 addresses?  Should they be x.500?  Would removing the x.400 resolve these NDRs or possibly make it worse?


brian smith


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3660

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>