A user wants to make a double booking in a room mailbox but receives an automatic decline message.
I want to enable double booking on this room mailbox, how do I do that?
Does this have something to do with? output get-calendarprocessing:
AutomateProcessing : AutoAcceptHi All,
Need your help in resolving the error, I am getting the below events every 15 min (EXc2013 CU8) , Only few users complained emails are getting delayed
Event ID : 1040
Source: MS Exchange transport delivery
The SMTP availability of the receive connector default mailbox delivery was low(0 percent) in the last 15 minutes.
Regards
Mohammed Eliyas
Hi,
I have new testing lab to play around with which is starting to drive me insane. I have exchange 2013 and outlook 2013. I can receive emails from external domains but I am unable to send emails internally or externally!
Now I would know what to look at if I couldn't send externally, But not being able to send internally has completed confused me!
anyone got any tips where to start troubleshooting for not being able to send internal mail? Once internal mail works I should then be able to get external mail working as well....
Thanks
Hello friends,
I have a curious problem.
My Windows Server 2012 R2 after a Update now has an output of traffic ranging from 8mb to 13mb per second continuously.
I have Kaspersky Antivirus that server and any intrusion or virus report.
They know tell me what I can do to find out what data it's sending that way?
It could be the DNS recursion, but I disabled recursion have not decided.
See the attachment.
Silvio Tavares - Analista de Sistemas
Hello,
we are receiving huge number of spam emails with our 2 mailboxes in queue on exchange server 2010.
someone pls give resolution.
Hello all.
We have a task to block all executable files.
So I have created a rule:
New-TransportRule -Name ‘Rule 2 – Block Executable Content-Priority ‘0’ -Enabled $true -AttachmentHasExecutableContent $True -RejectMessageReasonText ‘Block Rule 2 – Sorry your mail was blocked because it contained executable content’ -StopRuleProcessing $true -SetAuditSeverity Low -SenderAddressLocation HeaderOrEnvelope
But, for example, *.jar files are not blocked.
I know that transport agent has its' own procedure for identifying executable content, but does anybody else have such problem?
I just encountered an odd issue. I one of my users emailed two emails to another internal user, and the recipient didn’t get either of the emails. I went through the logs, and I was able to track the messages through the mail server. I even saw an indication that the email had been delivered. However, the user who was sent the email reports that he never saw the email. I have looked through his mailbox and did not see the email. He has not emptied his deleted items, and I don’t think he would go through the process of deleting one email.
Does anyone have any thoughts on what could have happened or ideas of where else I can look?
Thank you,
Andy
Andy Richards
Hi
The Junk E-mail Option is set to No Protection however emails (legitimate and spam) are still being redirected to the Junk Email folder. There is no email/domain in the blocked sender list.
Supposing with No protection, no email should go in Junk Email folder (unless is in blocked sender list) - is there a bug in Outlook?
Thank you
Best Regards,
RunspaceId : c602c481-6279-4b3d-8837-16ff57872403
TestMailflowResult : *FAILURE*
MessageLatencyTime : 00:00:00
IsRemoteTest : True
Identity :
IsValid : True
ObjectState : New
Regards, Rahul
Hello,
I have an exchange 2010 server with some antispam servers in front. Because of the setup we have, I have to use two different send connectors - 1 one for email to a specific domain which goes directly to the internet (cost 1) and another 1 for all other domains (cost 100).
The problem I have is that twice now, and only when the email with the large attachment is sent, server decides to use the connector to the antispam which causes a loop and I have massive queues of email stuck on exchange.
So my question is, is there a way to exclude a domain name from the send connector? Use this connector for everything but contoso.com?
Thanks in advance.
Peter
Hello,
it has been a while since my Exchange Server Edge-Transport (2010 Enterprise) installed new anti-spam definition files. 24th September 2016 was the last time.
Is there something wrong with the definition updates (we had this issue some time ago: Microsoft didn't Update the definition files for some months)? Anyone suffer under the same issue?
I am also wondering why it is called Standard-Antispam Updates and not Enterprise.
We have an Exchange 2013 on-premise server and seem to have an issue with emails sent to internal and external users at the same time.
The issue came to light because someone sent an email to 44 recipients, of which one was internal. None of the external recipients received the email. I checked the delivery report in the EAC and found the internal email marked as 'Delivered' and all of the external ones marked as 'Pending'. I checked the queues and there were none. I did some testing and sent an email to just one of the external addresses on the list, it arrived. I tried sending the email again to all of the recipients, the external ones all showed 'Pending'. I tried it again, but this time excluded the internal email address and all of the 43 external emails were immediately delivered.
So it seems that the issue only arises when we are sending to both internal and external addresses.
I then tried a test email to one internal address and one external address. The Delivery report says that the internal address was delivered immediately, while the external address is 'Pending' and gives more information saying: 'Message delivery is taking longer than expected. There may be system delays. For more information, contact your helpdesk.'. To add further mystery to this, the email was actually delivered.
So, I have two concerns:
First is seems that some emails sent both internally and externally are only arriving internally. This is a huge problem because I don't know how many have been affected. There may be many lost emails we don't know about.
Second, it looks like I can't trust the delivery report. It says pending for some emails which didn't arrive, but it also says pending for some which did arrive. That is no good at all.
For info the server is running Windows Server 2012. I have run a Microsoft Update to check if there are any to apply and the only Exchange one is a spam filter update, which I doubt has any bearing but I will apply when I get chance.
Hi there guys, i need your help.
I got test environment with smtp server (not EX). I can not find exchange 2010 forum so im writing here.
What do i need?
I need to get emails from that smtp server to exchange and allow to send it to other company but only for certain addresses. For example, that smtp server is domain named test.com(.local). I want to send emails from my internal test smtp server to my exchange. I do not want to allow all emails been send to other company. From all this emails i can send some of them to recipients:
user1@friendexternaldomain.com, user5@friendexternaldomain.com and user 13@friendexternaldomain.com.
Other emails cannot be send (from that server).
Structure looks like here:
test smtp server -> exchange -> postfix as forwarder (and here we got rule that friendexternaldomain.com is send by vpn to our friend company, other mails to otherexternaldomains.xxx goes to the internet). I know all forwarded mails will be send by postfix
to friendexternaldomain.com but im afraid that plp can write manually private addresses and it will be directed to the internet). I just want to be sure that mails from internal test smtp send to this defined recipients exchange will forward, and if smth comes
from this internal server and the recipient will be other than defined, exchange will not forward it to postfix). All other company mails must work like its working now.
Can i do smth only on exchange, without reconfigurin last email server (postfix forwarder) ? If im not clear please ask.
I need to setup a Powershell script to periodically delete all emails in a specific Queue ID. I have tried the following and receive errors (following PS line post):
Get-TransportServer | Get-Queue | Get-Message -ResultSize unlimited | where {Queue -eq "<server>\<queueID>"}
| Remove-Message -WithNDR $False
Errors:
Pipeline not executed because a pipeline is already executing. Pipelines cannot be executed concurrently.
+ CategoryInfo : OperationStopped: (Microsoft.Power...tHelperRunspace:ExecutionCmdletHelperRunspace) [],
PSInvalidOperationException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : RemotePipelineExecutionFailed
A positional parameter cannot be found that accepts argument '<server>\<queueID>'.
+ CategoryInfo : InvalidArgument: (:) [Get-Queue], ParameterBindingException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : PositionalParameterNotFound,Get-Queue
What am I doing wrong? Manual deletion of the stuck emails is not acceptable, it needs to run on a schedule. Please advise. TIA
I have a single multi-role Exchange 2013 server and it would appear that it's not properly maintaining the temp files for the transport service. I still have all those folder locations at their default and the problem folder is c:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V15\TransportRoles\data\Temp
I never had a problem with this in Exchange 2007 but I am used to running a PowerShell script nightly to clean up the IIS log files. Do I need to do something similar for this temp folder? Is there a setting I can adjust so that Exchange will limit the size of this folder itself? If I stop the transport service and delete the files here will I lose anything?
Any suggestions or insight would be greatly appreciated.
Exchange 2013 SmartHost LoadMaster Kemp multirole cas and mbox servers not receiving emails
Good Day,
I can send emails with no issues, but I cannot receive anything.
Please advice.
Organization has two Exchange 2013 servers installed in different sites. Sites are connected via satellite link with high latencies (600-1000ms). In the near future TCP-acceleration on network equipment will be disabled because of encryption enforcement. Without TCP-acceleration single TCP (and SMTP) session speeds up to 200kbit/s maximum.
It looks that Exchange servers do not create more than one SMTP session when transferring messages from server one to another inside of organization and when we turn TCP-acceleration off, messages just stand in queue waiting for other messages to transfer. If Exchange could create for example a new SMTP session for every message it would help in our situation.
Is there a way to increase a number of simultaneous SMTP sessions between two Exchange servers, or is there another way to speed up messages transfer in our situation?
Does Exchange behavior vary in other versions? 2010? 2016?
Thanks!
Bom dia,
Eu tenho o Microsoft SQL Server 2016 instalado no meu PC (Windows 10 Home 64-Bit). Quando abro o SQL Server Management Studio e escrevo o Server Name (supostamente o nome do meu PC), aparece uma mensagem de erro.
Já tentei com o servidor MySQL do XAMPP ligado, mas dá o mesmo erro.
Podem-me ajudar?
Obrigado,
Guilherme
Hello, Team!
I think I’ve found a serious issue in last CU releases. This is the case:
1 Multirole server Exchange 2013 SP1 (and older) , one creceive connector from internet to this server, no edge, nothing.
I care about preventing spoofing my company’s email addresses, and remove remove the ms-Exch-SMTP-Accept-Authoritative-Domain-Sender transport permission from anonymous senders.
To do this, we usually simple run powershell command
Remove-ADPermission <ReceiveConnector Name> –user “NT AUTHORITY\Anonymous Logon” –ExtendedRights ms-Exch-SMTP-Accept-Authoritative-Domain-Sender
This command works on Exchange SP1, the client (telnet session, f.e.) which try spoof address of company will be refused. (see screenshot below)
But in Exchange 2013 CU5, CU6 and even CU7 release this revoke permissions DOESN’T WORKS without any errors, softly. I've try Powershell and ADSI but unsuccessfully.
Then we take off permission on connector above, we keep 3 default permissions:
Accept-any-sender
Accept-Routing-Headers
Submit-Message to Server
It is wonderful works only on server SP1, but not on servers with older versions, which have right settings.
The saddest thing is I have information about Office 365 this behavior reproduced too. And I also think what in your lab you could take 15 minutes and play this simply thing....
I found only that information on connector side is diffenent on SP1 and CU5,6,7.
This is normal connection on SP1, when somebody try spoofed address. We can see a 250 AUTH Response on server side, and server refuse fake connection, all right.
And on CU5 and newest versions we doesnt see this code. Maybe auth mechanism miss something?
Any suggestions? On MS connect site a didn't found exchange bugs topic :)
Hi guys,
in our organization we are using Exchange 2013 latest build, we pick up the emails using our POP 3 connector from the domain registra and send usining our ISP Smarthost using port 25 because port 587 never works.
lately every emails we sent its bounce back with the warning '550-Message refused by spam filter |
Can you please advise how to fix this irritating issue ?
a much appreciate it